Pennies from Heaven

Anyone looking to make a small investment "right now" might want to look at all those pre-1983 pennies that your have accumulated in your house.  I will show you how you can double your money just by counting pennies.  Sounds too good to be true?  No, it is true!  Just thank the Federal Reserve System for providing you with this opportunity through its easy credit (money) policy.   These polices have sent the prices for "copper and zinc" on an exponential rise.

Using the latest metal prices for copper and zinc, these are the numbers required to calculate the metal value of pre-1983 pennies:  

$3.4592	=	Copper Price/Pound on Dec 13, 2011.
$0.8779	=	Zinc Price/Pound on Dec 13, 2011.
.05	=	Zinc %
3.11	=	Total weight in grams
.00220462262	=	Pound/gram conversion factor  (Prices are quoted in pounds.  Therefore, the reason for the conversion.)

 

1. Calculate 95% copper value of Pre-1983 pennies:

    ($3.4592 × .00220462262 × 3.11 × .95)  =  $0.0225314

2. Calculate 5% zinc value:

    ($0.8779 × .00220462262 × 3.11 × .05)  =  $0.0003009

3. Add the two together:

    $0.0225314 + $0.0003009 = $0.0228323 (Value of that Penny)

  $0.0228323 is the metal value for the 1909-1982 copper pennies as of December 13, 2011, or 128.32% increase from its face value.  Therefore, get those "penny jars and penny banks" out and start going through those pennies to find those pre-1983s.  What are you waiting for?  Go calculate your new found wealth, now! 

 

Bear Still Alive

What is Backing Your Deposits in Your Bank?

The answer to the question in the title is for all practical purposes "NOTHING."  And, of course, therein lies the problem with where you bank.  Because U.S. banks are no longer required to hold any of their deposits in reserves.  I would gather that the vast majority reading this post did not know that.

The following excerpt, which you just might want to read, is taken from Risks in Banking from Bob Prechter's Conquer the Crash:

"Between 1929 and 1933, 9000 banks in the United States closed their doors.  President Roosevelt shut down all banks for a short time after his inauguration.  In December 2001, the government of Argentina froze virtually all bank deposits, barring customers from withdrawing the money they thought they had.  Sometimes such restrictions happen naturally, when banks fail; sometimes they are imposed.  Sometimes the restrictions are temporary; sometimes they remain for a long time.

Why do banks fail?  For nearly 200 years, the courts have sanctioned an interpretation of the term “deposits” to mean not funds that you deliver for safekeeping but a loan to your bank.  Let’s repeat that in another way.  Your bank balance, then, is an IOU from the bank to you, even though there is no loan contract and no required interest payment. Thus, legally speaking, you have a claim on your money deposited in a bank, but practically speaking, you have a claim only on the loans that the bank makes with your money.  If a large portion of those loans is tied up or becomes worthless, your money claim is compromised.  A bank failure simply means that the bank has reneged on its promise to pay you back.  The bottom line is that your money is only as safe as the bank’s loans.  In boom times, banks become imprudent and lend to almost anyone.  In busts, they can’t get much of that money back due to widespread defaults.  If the bank’s portfolio collapses in value, say, like those of the Savings & Loan institutions in the U.S. in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the bank is broke, and its depositors’ savings are gone."

Make sure you check out to see what bank in your state is the safest.  You just might want to check these banks out.  

Austerity Measures for the Queen



In a further sign of dire economic times, Buckingham Palace is now doing some budget busting with the queen herself due for a pay freeze, and Prince Charles set to foot the bill for some major expenses.  According to Ingrid Seward, editor-in-chief of Royal magazine, the queen is going around Buckingham Palace turning off the lights, having fewer staff, and even turning the heat down.  She sometimes even writes letters in her very own fur coat.  Ingrid also reports that it is quite sad to see the Queen Mother having to act in such a common fashion.

Bear Still Alive From EMA Strategy

Analysis of Yesterday's Employment Numbers

How is it possible to have such a major drop in the unemployment rate from 9% to 8.6% when new jobs only came in at 120,000?  Answer: Labor Force Participation down from 64.2% to 64.0% as more people leave the work force (315,000 to be exact), because there are no jobs out there.  And the beauty of it from a statistical standpoint is that if you are not in the employment pool, you are not counted!  Therefore, the unemployment rate will statistically be better.  Wow!  Don’t you just love statistics and how the BLS uses them?  The only reason the unemployment rate went down was because people became so discouraged and frustrated that they could not find work they just gave up. Thus, the BLS considers that to be a positive improvement on the employment front.  You got to me kidding me; but, of course, I am not.  But, the Administration, news headlines, and mainstream financial pundits simply mentioned that the employment picture vastly improved, because the rate dropped from 9% to 8.6%.  With such uninformed utterances for the real truth, I am reminded what Macbeth said: “It is a tale told by idiots, full of sound and fury signifying absolutely nothing.” 

Please pay very close attention to my next sentence.  U.S. needs to generate 262,500 jobs per month to return to 2007 employment levels over the next five years.  This means that unless that number of jobs is created each month for the next five years, America will have a higher unemployment rate in October 2016 than it did in December 2007. Now, how realistic is it that the US economy can create 15.8 million jobs in the next five years with our totally dysfunctional Congress?

Unemployment Rate at 8.6% for November

The economy added 120,000 jobs in November on expectations of 125,000.  (I wonder how many of those so-called new jobs resulted from the "Birth/Death Statistic?")  The unemployment rate declined from 9% to 8.6% one expectations that it would remain at 9%.  (I will have more later after I have a chance to analyze all the numbers.)

Government Motors Willing to Buy Back Volts

Now this is a vote of confidence to run out and buy that all electric car, which GM admits could catch fire.  According to the Associate Press, "General Motors will buy Chevrolet Volts back from any owner who is afraid the electric cars will catch fire."  I guess that is why only 6,000 have been sold.  I am convinced that the Volt is going the way of the Edsel.  The Volt was a government idea from day one.  This is what happens when the government tries to pick winners and losers.  (Does anyone remember Solyndra?)  And, it's track record is lousy.  That is the function of a market economy, not the government. 

Total Global Debt to GDP

The following chart is presented without any further comment because none is needed.  Except for the following statement by Kyle Bass: "Total Debt-to-GDP only breached 200% when nations were spending on war. Today we are at 310%."  As I have stated many times on this blog, this whole debt situation is not going to end well.  In other words, you can not grow total debt at 11% when GDP is growing at 2%. 

Twitter Post

This is what I said on my Twitter account (twitter.com/debauche) last Wednesday, November 23, "$INDU should bounce back (Bear Rally) to 11,600 from these very oversold levels."  And, sure enough, the market came back from Thanksgiving with a bang.  Main reasons are, as indicted on Twitter, oversold levels and seasonality.   (See the following chart.)  Today, the high on the $INDU was 11,624 but closed at 11,556.  Can it go higher?  Of course, it can.  However, the 200-day EMA now stands at 11,693, which is the new resistance level.  Saying all this, the fact is still that the long-term of the market is still down. 

Eurozone Finance Ministers OK $10.7 Billion Greek Loan

You are going to love this one!  The Associated Press reports that "Eurozone finance ministers have approved $10.7 billion bailout loan installment for Greece."  Now get this.  "The EU had demanded, and received, letters from the leaders of Greece's main political parties pledging support for tough austerity measures to get the loan."  How often have we heard this statement by Greece?  To be honest with you, I can not count that high!  And, where will the EU get the $10.7 billion?  Oh, it will simply print it, just like our Fed.  The game is just about up.  No one believes that the EU will survive.  Who are they really trying to fool?  I guess themselves.  Good luck with plan, but there is always the next plan.

SuperDud

As everyone knows by now, the so-called "Supercommittee" has been a total disaster, failure.  It, of course, should come as no surprise, since it was doomed from the start because of the partisan composition of the committee.  It is very sad that we have come to the point where it is all about politics, not what is best for America.  Here we have a committee that could not agree on how to cut government spending by $120 billion, or something like 3%, from total government spending of $3.6 trillion.  Maybe, just maybe, Congress could learn something from a drug addict.  However, I doubt it, because we haven't hit rock bottom yet.

SPX Update for Week Ended November 18, 2011

Double-click inside of chart to enlarge it.

Federal Reserve Now Largest Owner of U.S. Government Debt—Surpassing China

The Federal Reserve said that as of September 2011, it owned $1.665 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities. That was more than double the $812 billion in U.S. Treasury securities the Fed said it owned as of September 2010.  Meanwhile, China owned $1.1483 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities, which was down slightly from the $1.1519 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities the Chinese owned as of the end of September 2010. 

Given our fractional-reserve banking system, that $1.7 trillion of Fed credit has the potential to expand liquidity in our economy by a factor of 10, or approximately $16 trillion.  That is a lot of moola, which can be equated to a lot of inflation if it wasn't for the decline in money velocity.  See the following chart.

As long as the velocity of money is trending down and below its long-term average of 1.68, price deflation rules the day.

Recessions and Silver Prices

The November 2011 issue of Robert Prechter's Elliott Wave Theorist draws an interesting relationship between recessions and silver prices.  His conclusion is that if one is bearish on the economy, one should be bearish on silver.  Likewise, if one is bullish on the economy, one should be bullish on silver.  In other words, being bearish on the economy, but bullish on silver would go against history.  See the following chart from the Elliott Wave Theorist.  He does point out that during hyper-inflationary periods, precious metals would be the investment of choice.  However, we are not at that hyper-inflationary zone yet, according to Mr. Prechter.  He sees further weakness in silver, likewise with gold.

Two-Thirds of Senate, Nearly Half of House Rank as Millionaires

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, "Being a millionaire typically qualifies you as part of the American financial elite.  But in Congress, it only makes you average.  About 47 percent of Congress, or 250 current members of Congress, are millionaires.  The median net worth of a current U.S. Senator stood at an average of $2.63 million in 2010, while the median net worth among House Members was $756,765."

I wonder if "insider trading," which is legal for a member of Congress to do, had anything to do with the millionaire status.  That is, the net wealth of a member coming into Congress verses net worth leaving Congress.  That would be a great study.  I wonder if I could get a government grant to undertake such a study.  Oh, it would have to be approved by Congress.  On second thought, I don't think such a grant would be approved.  Do you?

What is 19 Feet High?

The fact that GE paid no taxes in 2010 was widely reported earlier this year, but the size of its tax return was not reported.  Are you really for the "size of its tax return?"  It will literally blow you away.  For 2010, GE's tax return would have been 57,000 pages had it been filed on paper, which would equate to 19 feet high if printed out and stacked.  No, that is not a misprint.  57,000 pages are correct.

On its $14 billion in profits, $9 billion dollars came from overseas, outside the jurisdiction of U.S. tax law.  Also, GE wasn't taxed on $5 billion in U.S. profits; because it utilized numerous deductions and tax credits, including tax breaks for investments in low-income housing, green energy, and research & development, as well as depreciation of property.

National Debt Rises Over $15 Trillion

It is official our National Debt is now above $15 trillion.  Keep-in-mind the "Debt Ceiling" that was put into place in August is $15.194 trillion.  Also, our GDP is $15.024 trillion, or our National Debt equals GDP.  Now, what are you going to do, Washington?  No, what are we, as Americans, going to demand from Washington to resolve our debt crisis?

I am calling for a "National Week of Mourning," which will commence tomorrow, November 17, 2011.  All American flags should be flown at "half staff" for the next week.  It is truly a very sad day for all Americans.

Postal Service Reports $5 billion Loss

The loss could have been worse, to the amount of $10.6 billion.  However, through the graciousness of your Congress, a $5.5 billion payment that was required to fund retiree health benefits was postponed.  I wonder who is going to pay that amount?  Oh, silly me, you, of course, as the U.S. taxpayer.  Hopefully, your friendly postal carrier will thank you with tomorrow's mail delivery.

I Wonder Why?

Did you know that Congress is exempt from insider trading laws?  Maybe it is about time that we change the way Congress does business. 



Food for Thought

Don't Let Me Down, Bears!

French and Germans Explore Idea of Smaller Euro Zone

On Thursday, September 22, 2011, I posted the following message, which was entitled, “Member Countries of the European Union (EU).”

The EU currently has 27 member countries, which have transferred some of their sovereignty, or lawmaking authority, to the EU. I believe that very shortly we will have something far less than 27 EU members.  The number that I have in mind is "10."  Which ten will eventually make up the EU? 

Well now, Reuters report, "German and French officials have discussed plans for a radical overhaul of the European Union that would involve establishing a more integrated and potentially smaller euro zone.  French President Nicolas Sarkozy gave some insight to his thinking during an address to students in the eastern French city of Strasbourg on Tuesday, when he said a two-speed Europe -- the euro zone moving ahead more rapidly than all 27 countries in the EU -- was the only model for the future.  Also, the discussions among senior policymakers in Paris, Berlin and Brussels go further, raising the possibility of one or more countries leaving the euro zone, while the remaining core pushes on towards deeper economic integration, including on tax and fiscal policy."

Now, where did I come up with my “10 nations?”   I arrived at it from Biblical prophecy.  Look up and read for yourself in Daniel 7: 19-27 and Revelation 17: 12-13.

President Obama Calls Off Christmas Tree Tax

Yes, it is true.  He is rescinding the tax on Christmas trees.  I guess he doesn't want to be known as President Scrooge. 

Unemployment Rate Drops to 9% with the Creation of 80,000 Jobs for October

Now, I will give you the real truth of the employment numbers.  The infamous "Birth/Death Model" of the BLS added 103,000 jobs, which is a statistical adjustment, not real jobs!  Therefore, if we back out that statistic, we lost 23,000 jobs for the month of October.  So far for 2011, the "Birth/Death Model" has added something like 530,000 jobs, or 42% of all jobs created.  And yet, people still believe what comes from the BLS.  Well, stupid is as stupid does. 

Do You Know Your Fannie from Your Freddie?

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE) in the home mortgage business.  They have the exact same business model, and they do the exact same thing.  That is, they buy mortgages on the secondary market, pool them, and then sell them as mortgage-backed securities to investors on the open market.  Everything else regarding government guarantees, explicit guarantees, implicit guarantees, subsidies and direct government funding is exactly the same for Freddie Mac as it is for Fannie Mae.

The main difference between Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae is that Fannie Mae primarily buys mortgages issued by banks and Freddie Mac primarily buys mortgages issued by thrifts (savings and loans).

The Associated Press (AP) reported today that Freddie Mac has requested $6 billion in additional aid after posting a wider loss in the third quarter.  Freddie Mac said that it lost $6 billion in the July-September quarter.  That compares with a loss of $4.1 billion in the same quarter of 2010.

The government rescued Freddie Mac and sibling Fannie Mae in September 2008 after massive losses on risky mortgages threatened to topple them.  Since then, a federal regulator has controlled their financial decisions.  (We can all see what good that has done!)

Taxpayers have spent about $169 billion to rescue Fannie and Freddie, which is the most expensive bailout of the 2008 financial crisis.  The government estimates it will cost at least $51 billion more to support the companies through 2014, and maybe as much as $142 billion in the most extreme case.

Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee about 50% of all U.S. mortgages, or nearly 31 million home loans worth more than $5 trillion.  Along with other federal agencies, they backed nearly 90 percent of new mortgages over the past year.

As mentioned previously, Fannie and Freddie buy home loans from banks and other lenders, package them into bonds with a guarantee against default, and then sell them to investors around the world.  When property values drop, homeowners default, because they are unable to afford the payments or because they owe more than the property is worth.  Because of the guarantees, Fannie and Freddie must pay for the losses.  (That would of course be you, acting as the American taxpayer.)

Fannie and Freddie are required to pay 10% dividends on the government money they receive.  Freddie paid $1.6 billion in dividends to the U.S. Treasury Department in the July-September quarter.

Mark-to-Market Accounting (FAS 157), Greece, Credit Default Swaps (CDS), and Sabanes Oxley

It all started on March 16, 2009 when FASB proposed that companies use more flexibility in valuing their assets under "mark-to-market" accounting.  A move that financial institutions said would ease balance-sheet pressures many were feeling during the economic crisis of the subprime debacle.  On April 2, 2009, after a 15-day public comment period, FASB eased the mark-to-market rules.  Financial institutions are still required by the rules to mark transactions to market prices but more so in a steady market and less so when the market is inactive.  In other words, companies, especially financial institutions, can do whatever they like.  Today, you cannot trust any balance sheet given to you today.  (One reason why I am a technical analyst, not a fundamental analyst.)  It is really that simple.  The reason is that the government demanded that FASB allow these lies as a business practice when it comes to the alleged value of securities. 

Then, on April 9, 2009, FASB issued the official update to FAS 157 that eases the mark-to-market rules when the market is unsteady or inactive.  Early adopters were allowed to apply the ruling as of March 15, 2009, and the rest as of June 15, 2009.  It was anticipated that these changes could significantly boost banks' statements of earnings and allow them to defer reporting losses.  The changes, however, affected accounting standards applicable to a broad range of derivatives, not just banks holding mortgage-backed securities.

Opponents argue that the implications for investors are that the valuation of assets underlying such securities will be increasingly difficult to analyze, not less so.  An example would be determining a company's actual assets, equity and earnings, which will be overstated if the assets are not allowed to be marked down appropriately.

As expected today (October 27, 2011), here is ISDA with the most farcical of decisions, similar to FASB in 2009.  From Reuters: "A new voluntary deal for holders of Greek debt to accept deeper losses is unlikely to trigger a 'credit event' that would cause a payout on default insurance (CDS), said a top lawyer at the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.  Greek bondholders face losses of 50 % under a plan to lower the country's debt burden and contain the euro zone's long-running debt crisis.  The aim is to complete negotiations on the package by the end of the year.  But because participation in the deal is voluntary rather than forced, it would typically not trigger payment on CDS contracts."

And now we have MF Global (October 31, 2011), who is missing something like a billion dollars of client funds.  Or, should I simply say that MF Global stole its clients’ funds, which is exactly what happened.  Once again, where are the regulators?  MF Global was not just your common “Ma and Pa Brokerage Company.”  It was a “Primary Government Security Dealer,” who is supposed to have unquestionable financial strength.  By the way, I thought Dodd-Frank was supposed to put in place checks and balances to stop this type of activity.   And, then there is Sarbanes Oxley.  There have been multiple bank failures by public companies that filed balance sheets under penalty of criminal prosecution just weeks before they failed.  These banks had balance sheets that showed perfectly, healthy institutions.  The FDIC has documented dozens of bank failures, privately-held and publicly-traded, where those balance sheets were proven to be factually false, as the losses have been 20%, 30%, 40% or even more just a few weeks later.   It is beyond comprehension that the assets in question could have actually lost 30% or 40% of their value within that period of time.  The only explanation is that these financial statements were indeed falsified.  Sarbanes-Oxley makes this a criminal matter.  Where are the indictments against the CEOs of these institutions?  (Sources: Market-Ticker and Wall Street Journal)

Interesting Chart: History Does Repeat

Food Stamp Participation: 73% Increase Since 2007

Note: Click inside of table to enlarge it.

S&P 500 Update

Wow!  What a day for the world equity markets.  EU ministers have just cured all the financial problems of Greece and the other 26 EU countries with just a stroke of their pens.   Let's see how long the euphoria will last.  Already there are cracks in the dike coming from Germany's central bank.

 

U.S. Consumer is Spending Again

Preliminary Real GDP for the 3rd Quarter came in at 2.5%, which is up from 1% for the 2nd Quarter of 1.3%.  On the surface that looks very encouraging.  Let's take a peek beneath the surface.  What do we find?  Well, personal income increased at a whopping 0.9% versus 4.6% for the 2nd Quarter.  That's not good at all.  Further, disposable income increased at 0.6% versus 3.9% for the 2nd Quarter.  Still no good!  Finally, consumer spending increased at 4.9% versus 3.7% for the 2nd Quarter.  Yes, the consumer is back with the income.  How is the consumer being able to spend?  Oh, take on more debt.  You would of thought the consumer would have learned something from 2008.  I guess memories are just short lived.

Message of Hope for Bears

A reader over at SlopeofHope posted the following "market analog" comparing 2008 with 2011.  I thought given today's EU fantasy driven market (all has been resolved in Europe and the world) that it would provide a useful roadmap going forward. 

Arab Spring

Libya's transitional leader says Islamic Sharia Law will be the "basic source" of all law.  You may want to become very familiar with what constitutes "Sharia Law." 

Do You Know the Difference Between a Democracy and Republic Form Of Government?

Soaring Prices Push Queen Elizabeth Close to Fuel Poverty

Yes, you read the title correctly about the Queen Mother.  The Queen, herself, prowls the corridors, switching off lights, a Buckingham Palace employee reported.  The Queen Mother is coming perilously close to joining millions of her subjects in “fuel poverty” as energy bills for her four palaces and a draughty castle absorb a rising share of her income.  To make matters worse, the Queen’s government has since frozen her income, while her average energy bill has risen 20%.  No, I am not pulling your leg on this one.  I am just not that creative to make this stuff up.  See the following article entitled, "Soaring Prices."  She is not asking for donations from her subjects at this time, but donations can be sent to the "Master of the Household” at Buckingham Palace.   

What Percent Are You?

Informative site from the Wall Street Journal that provides your percentile income rank based on your "Adjusted Gross Income." Just click-on "What Percent Are You?"

Bear Trend: It Is What It Is!

Upcoming College Bubble

Student loan debt outstanding is over $800 billion, which of course is higher than credit card debt outstanding.  Worse yet, student loan debt will exceed $1 Trillion next year. Is a college degree worth it?  Watch the video, especially if you have children thinking about attending college. 

Biden 2016? "I'll Make Up My Mind On That Later"

Yes, Joe Biden is thinking about making a run for President in 2016.  This guy just doesn't know when to quit.  But then again, it is Joe Biden.  The name that keeps on giving!

If Solyndra Made Your Blood Boil, Wait Until You Hear about Fisker Automotive

ABC New reports that Fisker Automotive, an electric car company,  received a $529 million federal government loan guarantee.  It is assembling its first line of cars in Finland.  Fisker is saying it could not find a facility in the United States capable of doing the work.  (Yes, you read it correctly.  Finland will be the recipient of 500 manufacturing jobs, not America.)

"Vice President Joseph Biden heralded the Energy Department's $529 million loan to the start-up electric car company as a bright new path to thousands of American manufacturing jobs.  But two years after the loan was announced, the job of assembling the electric car has been outsourced to Finland."  What I can I say; it is simply Biden being Biden!

It is not a "Left/Right" Issue!

I totally agree with Dylan's guests.  Finally, we, who have been saying this same thing for years about financial fraud coming from the Fed and Wall Street, are gaining creditability.  Watch the video and see if you agree.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

EMA Strategy

The bottom-line is that the market’s primary trend is down, which is based on the EMA Strategy.  As long as the 15-week EMA remains below the 40-week EMA, downward trend will remain in force. 

I know many of you are looking at the market since October 4 and are wondering if the bears have lost their nerve.  The majority of market pundits on CNBC and Fox Business are saying the worse is over.  This reminds me of my conversation many, many years ago that I had with the late Robert Edwards, who with John McGee wrote the bible on technical analysis, entitled “Technical Analysis of Stock Trends.”  I was doing my thesis on technical analysis for the completion of my MBA at the Zicklin School of Business, CUNY Baruch College.  My question to Mr. Edwards was how do you handle the daily financial and global news that goes into making investment decisions.   His response was: “always be objective.”  He went on to explain that once he had identified the primary trend of the market, say bearish, he only focused on bearish news.  That is, only focus on reason why the market is suppose to go down.  And, if the trend were up, he would focus on only reasons why the market should go up.  Also, he indicated that he never read the current edition of the Wall Street Journal.  He would save them for the week and read them over the weekend.  I asked, of course, why?  And, he responded that he always wants to be as objective as possible.  He said that we all bring our own biases for why the market should behave the way we think it should behave.  Therefore, he did not want his own biases to influence his investment judgment.  His focus was entirely on listening to what the market was saying, not the Wall Street Journal.  He also indicated that when he charts, he would do so in a “blind format.”  That is, not knowing the chart names.  Why?  He wanted to be as objective as possible and not being influenced by his own biases in regard to the company he was analyzing. 

Therefore, my advice, which was gained many years ago from Robert Edwards, is to simply focus on all the reasons why this market should being going down, because we know that the primary trend is bearish.  Forgot about all that noise from those “Bulltarts.”  As a matter of fact, don’t watch Bloomberg News, CNBC, or Fox Business.  Simply focus on what the EMA Strategy is saying!

You Are Hired!

Now, this is a college student that I would hire in a second!  Definitely not one of those "OWS" types.

Marc Faber Gets It: Eliminate Keynesian Policies, Adopt Austrian Policies

Wall Street Has Bought Congress for $1.1 Billion (How Does That Make You Feel?)

European Financial Stability Facility

The start of another week and European stock futures are up nicely.  The reason is more promises by Germany and France that the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), or toxic bank (As I call it, or better yet, European Stability Sure to Fail.) will save the day.  It will simply take, say, a trillion dollars or more to put "Humpty Dumpty" back together, which of course Europe does not have.

Repeat Performance: Back By Popular Demand

If you didn't watch this video the first time, you just might want to take three minutes of your time and do it now.

Sarbanes-Oxley: Criminalization for False Accounting Statements

There have been multiple bank failures by public companies that filed balance sheets under penalty of criminal prosecution just weeks before they failed.  These banks had balance sheets that showed perfectly, healthy institutions.  The FDIC has documented dozens of bank failures, privately-held and publicly-traded, where those balance sheets were proven to be factually false, as the losses have been 20%, 30%, 40% or even more just a few weeks later.   It is beyond comprehension that the assets in question could have actually lost 30% or 40% of their value within that period of time.  The only explanation is that these financial statements were indeed falsified.  Sarbanes-Oxley makes this a criminal matter.  Where are the indictments against the CEOs of these institutions?  But, then again, I guess Sarbanes-Oxley doesn’t pertain to banks. 

It's All Ok. Trust Me!

Thoughts

I have been thinking about what my feelings and reactions will be to those that did not heed the economic and financial facts of an eminent market collapse when it does occur.  I know there will be “gnashing of teeth” and outright hatred for all "Bears."   However, I will take solace in the simple fact that I have done my best to forewarn investors of the debacle.  For that, I will only have pity on the ignorance of all those investors (lemmings) who simply insisted that the market could only go up. 

DJIA Running into Resistance at These Levels