The Great Fiscal Stimulus Package of 1929

Does the title sound familiar, with the exception of 1929? Read the article and see if you can substitute 2008 into the title. Article is located at Mises.org. Make sure that you follow the link to the original article that was published in Times Magazine.

Need One Say More

The Market Has Spoken!

The weekly 1387 level on the S&P 500 was taken out this week (See chart below). Given this penetration, we are now either in a "major correction or bear market." Therefore, our focus will be on sell signals rather than buy signals. Sell signals are the mirror image of buy signals. Our primary bear market instrument is the SDS, which is an inverse ETS of the S&P 500. As an inverse ETS, its price rises when the market (S&P 500) sells off.

Since the market is extremely oversold, we should expect the market to rally short-term. Keep-in-mind that this is not a time to me looking for a major bottom. Don't get sucked in by those pundits who will be screaming that this is a golden opportunity to buy. Prepare yourself mentally to either short the market or purchase inverse ETFs, like SDS. The best chance for the market to make some kind of a bottom, based on market cycles, is around March 27, 2008.

Source: Jack Chan's "Simply Profits"

Inflation Jumps in 2007

Inflation rose to 4.1% in 2007 from 2.5% in 2006, which is the largest increase in 17 years! Take a look at the following chart of the growth of money. That just might help explain a good part of the reason for the increase in inflation.

Market: Critical Junction

As indicated in my post of January 15, 2008, all four long-term indicators have now turned "bearish." From a short-term perspective, this market is very "over sold," which should generate a price reaction back to resistance near term. If this is a start of a new bear market, similar to 2001-2002, the SPX must take out 1387 on a weekly basis. See the following chart from Jack Chan at Simply Profits. I will monitor very closely this critical level.

Investment Trend

As we head into 2008, the market is giving very negative (bearish) signals. If you have followed this blog over the course of the past semester, you would have been keep abreast of the key turning points to the market trend, especially the SPX's weekly 17-and 43-EMA's, which has been refined to a weekly 15 and 40 EMA's. Over this semester, I will continue monitor this long-term indicator along with three others, which are from the "Contrary Investor." These three indicators are the SPX Trend Line from 2000, SPX's 80-week MA, and SPX's 10- and 40-week MA. All four indicators are currently negative.

S&P 500 Index: Home Building vs. Department Stores

The following chart does not bode well for overall consumer confidence and the economy, especially for retail sales as we enter the Christmas shopping season. Keep-in-mind that consumers constitute approximately 71% of GDP.

Source: The Big Picture

Today's FOMC Meeting

On September 17, the Fed cut the Fed Funds rate by 50 basis points to 4.75%. This was the first rate cut by the Fed in 18 months. The rationale given by the Fed was because of the precarious situation of the credit markets, which really means the subprime mortgage mess.

Today, the Fed will cut the Fed Funds rate by 25 basis points. At least this is the betting line over at the Chicago Board of Trade. 98% of the traders are pricing in a 25 basis point cut, while only 8% are pricing in a 50 basis point cut. I am firmly in the camp of another rate cut, because our credit problems (subprime mortgages and SIV's) are still with us.

The importance today is not the Fed's action but the reaction of the markets, currency and equity. Rates cuts are generally considered bullish for the equity market, except when a recession is looming on the economic horizon. Thanks to the Contrary Investor for providing the following insight on the rates cuts that preceded the previous recession.

On January 3, 2001, the Fed cut the Fed Funds rate by 50 basis points; and the S&P 500 responded with a gain of 5%. Interesting the rate cut a month ago resulted in a 2.9% increase in the S&P 500.

Learning point is that not all rate cuts are bullish, but rather the key is the reaction of the financial markets to any change in monetary policy.

Washington Mutual's Earnings To Suffer From Mortgage Woes

The "Wall Street Journal" has just reported that Washington Mutual, one of the nation's largest mortgage originators, expects to set aside nearly $1 billion on a pretax basis in the third quarter to cover potential future mortgage losses and record a $150 million writedown on mortgage loans it planned to sell. Chairman and Chief Executive Kerry Killinger said, "While we're disappointed with our anticipated third-quarter results, we look forward to an improved fourth quarter as we continue to see good operating performance in our retail banking, card services and commercial group businesses." Did you noticed that he did not mention any improved performance for the mortgage side of the business for the fourth quarter.

Technical Analysis: Would You Purchase this Stock?

Question: Refer to the following "Point & Figure Chart" that goes back to 2003 and decide if you would purchase this stock. Point & Figure Charts provide a long-term perspective of price action. The X's indicate the price is rising and O's indicate the price is declining.

Answer: In your response, indicate the reason for your decision. [There is neither a right or wrong answer.]

Dollar Strategy

Yesterday was a great day on Wall Street. DJIA up 192 points or 1.38%, which puts the market back above 14,000. This surge in the market came despite Citigroup announcing that its profits may decline by 60% for the current quarter because of its subprime credit problems. Therefore, why did the market go up? Because the dollar is weak! That is the current conventional wisdom on Wall Street. A gradual dollar decline will help exports, which will be good for the economy. However, the optimal word is "gradual." If the dollar falls too fast, it could cause interest rates and inflation to rise, stock market to plummet, and foreigners to sell Treasury debt securities. Not a good scenario. However, take heart in that most economists believe that the dollar decline will be gradual and will not cause any major dislocations to the economy. In fact, the majority of economists, inclusive of the Fed, are saying that a weak dollar will help cushion the subprime real estate correction and be a real plus for the U.S. economy. In other words, the dollar decline will be contained. I believe we have heard all this before in which the containment crowd said that the subprime problems is not a cause for concern. I don't know about you, but I am not buying it. Then again, you be the judge and look at the following link that illustrates the dollar's performance: Trade-weighted value of the dollar.

What is the Dollar Worth?

The answer to the question in the title is "not much!" But then again, it depends on one's time horizon. However, if we go back to 1913, which by the way was the year that the Federal Reserve System was established, a dollar in 1913 would be worth only a "five cents" today. This is very interesting, because one of the Fed's main objectives is to maintain a stable currency as the protector of our economy's stability. Then again, in this day and age, who wants to be accountable for one's action.

Since the Fed cut the Fed Funds rate, it seems every currency, inclusive of Third World currencies, in the world has rallied against the dollar. The Euro is at an all time high, recently the dollar was trading at $1.412 to the Euro. Even the Canadian dollar (loonie) is now at par against the dollar, which is the first time in three decades. However, take solace, the dollar did hold its own against the Zimbabwean dollar where inflation in that country is only running at 15,000% a year.

In addition to the dollar's weakness against currencies in general, the price of oil exceeded $84 a barrel; and with the prospects of reflation, the price of gold went to $740.

Don't worry. The Fed has everything under control. Just look at how well they have protected the value of the dollar.

August Wholesale Prices Fall Sharply (What about core inflation?)

"The 1.4 percent decrease, the biggest since October 2006, followed a 0.6 percent increase in July, the Labor Department said today in Washington. So-called core prices, which exclude fuel and food costs, rose 0.2 percent after a 0.1 percent gain the month before."

The reason that I posted this information is to inform you that the market will do anything to justify a rate cut by the Fed. The whole emphasis in today's financial press is on the decline of wholesale prices, which in effect is saying that inflation at the wholesale level is in check. Therefore, the Fed can go ahead and cut interest rates. However, what is completely ignored is the fact that just a month ago the emphasis by the financial media was on "core inflation." And, if you noticed the last sentence in the first paragraph, you read that core inflation rose .2%, which on an annual basis is 2.4%. This was double from the previous month. The Fed generally would like the core inflation to be between 1% and 2%.

Will the Fed cut the Fed Funds rate? You bet! Will the equity markets be satisfied? Probably not. That is why the old Wall Street adage will probably be true, which is "Buy the rumor and sell the news."

Root Causes of Financial Bubbles

All financial bubbles, subprime included, start when the banking system is awash with liquidity (money). Then, the question one must ask is who or what provides the liquidity to the economy in the first place? From your course in Macroeconomics, you learned the answer to that question as being the Federal Reserve System. Therefore, the Fed initiates any financial bubble through increasing reserves (money) to the banking system, which in effect will lower interest rates. Then, banks, which now find themselves with additional reserves, will do what they are in business to do; and, of course, that is to make loans, i.e., mortgages. Because of low interest rates, which is caused by the increase supply of reserves, individuals are more than happy to borrow money, in this case, for that new home or refinance their current home and draw down any home equity that is available.

Another question to ask is why and when did the Federal Reserve increase reserves to the banks? The Fed started its current monetary expansion program after the last recession, 2002. The Fed realized that since the consumer is such an important component of GDP, something like 71%, it needed a catalyst to stimulate the economy. The consumer was that catalyst. By providing and injecting reserves to the banking system, the Fed knew that the desired outcome of GDP growth would occur through the assistance of the banking system and individual borrowers. However, this contrived real estate bubble has finally burst, as all bubbles do, and the consequences are going to be felt for many years to come. The Fed's solution will be to simply reinflate the economy and create another bubble.

What I find interesting about this current subprime mess is that no one or a very small fraction of the financial world is looking at the Fed as the real culprit or villain. However, I do hear that the subprime mess is the fault of mortgage banks, credit agencies, and hedge funds. But I firmly believe that these entities are not the "root" cause of the problem. For that, simply look at the Federal Reserve and its expansionary monetary policies.

By the way, the chart from my post of September 3, which was entitled, “Picture is Worth a Thousand Words,” is that of the Money Supply. The chart can be accessed at the following URL: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/MZMNS.

The Next Subprime Mess

Get ready for another financial debacle. This time it is going to be those nasty SIVs. No, I don't mean SUVs, which I guess the "Green Movement" would consider to be nasty. SIVs stand for "Structured Investment Vehicles. Trust me, SIVs will become as well known as those SUVs we drive.

These investment vehicles are entities that banks use to issue commercial paper, which is a money market instrument. With the proceeds, banks purchase corporate receivables, auto loans, credit card debt, and, yes, mortgages. Why is this so alarming? Take Citigroup, for example. Citigroup owns about 25% of the market for SIVs, which is approximately $100 billion according to the "Wall Street Journal" in its September 5, 2007 edition. Yet, in its 2006 filing with the SEC, there is no mention of it. What? How can this be? Well, accounting rules don't require banks to separately record these type of off-balance sheet investment vehicle on their main financial statements. One would have thought that the accounting profession would have learned something from Enron, World Com, and Global Crossing. The demise of each of these companies was directly tied to off-balance sheet vehicles.

The Federal Reserve System has a major challenge ahead of itself in trying to bring stability and trust back to the financial markets. In my opinion, these challenges are a direct result of their own polices instituted during the past five years. The banks and financial markets did not create this subprime mess or pending SIV mess. The Fed did that all by themselves. The banks and financial markets were just reacting to what the Fed was doing. That is, when the Fed reinflated the banking system with reserves (money), banks made loans. Because interest rates were low, which was caused by the Fed reinflating the banking system, individuals were more than happy to refinance their homes and draw down their home equity. This resulted in real GDP growth. However, the consequence of all this liquidity has been the inflation of all financial assets. Like all bubbles, they do burst; and we have already seen the subprime bubble burst. The next one just could be those nasty SIVs.

Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

A picture is worth a thousand words is a proverb that refers to the idea that complex stories can be told with just a single still image.

What is the name the above chart?

Did Someone Say, Volatility?

Let's see, on Tuesday, August 28, the DJIA was down 280 points or -2.1%. Then, the next day, Wednesday, August 29, the DJIA was up 247 points or +1.9%. Wow! Market schizophrenia rules the day.

This market is just waiting for Bernanke and friends to make of their minds on what to do about the Fed Funds rate. First, the discount rate was cut to 5.75%, which did calm the markets somewhat. However, you can not tell that by the past Tuesday and Wednesday. Second, the market is now anticipating that the Fed is going to cut the Fed Funds rate before its next scheduled meeting, which will be held on September 18. The cut in the discount rate was nothing but symbolic. The discount rate, a lagging rate, follows money market rates. So, if anything, it was probably a shrewed move by the Fed. I guess market participants should go back an revisit their Money and Banking course to get a quick refresher on Monetary Tools. If the Fed really wants to be serious about providing liquidity to the banking system, the recommended policy would be to reduce the reserve requirement ratio that depository institutions (banks) must hold on their deposits (liabilities). This action would immediately provide instant liquidity by way of excess reserves. These are the reserves that banks can loan out. May be the Fed could surprise us a cut these requirements, which would immediately tell me that the subprime and condo problem is a whole lot worse than most investors think it is.

If we get the cut in the Fed Funds rate or reserve requirement ratio, investors must watch the performance of the financial sector, consumer sector, and utility sector for clues of the overall strength to the economy. However, these three sectors need to start out performing the S&P 500 and penetrate their well defined resistance lines. So far, they have not outperformed the market. The following charts depict the performance of the three sectors relative to the S&P 500:

Stay tone. Things are going to get really interesting, very shortly.

Housing Prices: Steepest Drop in 20 Years

Standard & Poor reported today that U.S. home prices fell 3.2 percent in the second quarter. This is the steepest rate of decline in the housing index since 1987 when S&P first started tracking the index. The decline in home prices around the nation shows no evidence of a market recovery anytime soon.

Here is another sober thought to ponder that was stated in the recent issue of Barron's on August 27, "Up & Down Wall Street," There are over $1 trillion of securitized low-grade mortgages (subprime) outstanding and nearly three-quarters of a trillion dollars worth of mortgages whose adjustable rates are stated to rise over the next year."

The message from the above two reports assures us that the economy is about to experience an appreciably larger magnitude of pain in the months ahead. This is why I am now totally convinced that the Fed will not only cut the Fed Funds rate by 50 basis points but will provide sufficient liquidity (money) to save the entire banking system. When the Fed re-inflates, and they will, with a passion, the dilemma for them is the negative impact such a monetary policy has on the dollar.

Stay tone because all of this will come to the forefront in September. Oh, I forgot to mention that September will also bring earnings reports from banks and brokerages that will reveal the extent of their "losses" from subprime investments.

Markets at a Glance

For the week ended August 24, the DJIA advanced nearly 300 points. On Friday, August 24, the DJIA was up 142.99 points, NASDAQ was up 34.99, and Oil gained $1.26 to $71.09. It seems that the market has now fully priced in a 25 to 50 basis point cut in the Fed Funds rate by the Fed when they meet on September 18. If the Fed does not cut this key lending rate, the market will definitely go back and test the lows of August 16. Even if the Fed does cut the Fed Funds rate, there is a good chance the market will still decline; because of that Wall Street axiom that states, "buy the rumor, sell the news."

What about this week? The subprime real estate bubble will continue to dominate the market. Last week's infusion of $2 billion into Countrywide Financial by Bank of America still leaves more unanswered questions, especially in the funding area for Countrywide. Now, we are hearing that condominiums have their own set of defaults and foreclosures. Major markets across the country, especially in parts of Florida, California, and Washington, D.C., are seeing rising foreclosures and bankruptcies of entire condo projects.

Another concern, near term, is that the market has been rising on low volume, which equates to lack of conviction. Also, the months of September and October have not been kind to the markets.

Presidential Cycle: Third-Year Correction

The "Contrary Investor" provided the following data on the third-year corrections from market highs to market lows for Presidential Cycles; which is very informative, given the current market conditions and, of course, we are in that third-year cycle now.

The corrections during the third-year of the Presidential Cycle had a mean and median declines of 9.8% and 9.2%, respectively, for the S&P 500. If we look at the current declines from the market highs of July 19 to the current lows of August 16, we have the DJIA down 11.79%, S&P 500 down 11.87%, NASDAQ down 12.41%, and the Wilshire 5000 down 12.4%. These declines are all within the parameters for the third-year Presidential Cycle declines and the normal corrections within a bull market. Therefore, as long as the "critical-mass levels," which were mentioned in the previous post hold and the 17-week EMA holds above the 43-week EMA, the bull market remains as such.