"Let us say you
borrowed $1 million at an interest rate of 10%, which was a good rate
in the early 1980s. (See the above chart.) You would pay $100,000 in interest a year
to keep that money outstanding.
Now, the rate of interest falls to 5%.
You could pay $50,000 in interest, or you could borrow another million and spend it, keeping the interest payment
at $100,000. What do you think both corporations, governments, and individuals did? They
borrowed the second million and spent it.
Now, the rate falls to 2.5%. You could once again
pay $50,000 in interest, or you
could borrow another two million. Again, what do you
think they did? Yes, there is
now four million outstanding that has been spent!
This continues until today, when one can borrow at close to 1%.
Instead of $1 million, you
can now have $10 million outstanding with the same annual interest expense of
$100,000.” (Market Ticker)
Effect of an interest rate reversal: What happens when
the rate of interest goes to 2% from a mere 1%? Answer: The interest payment required to keep the $10 million outstanding doubles
to $200,000. If you can't come up with it, then the only way to reduce
it, other than bankruptcy, is to pay down $5 million of the $10
million you have outstanding. However, you don't have $5 million; you
spent it. That was, after all, the entire point of borrowing the money!
Oh, but you say the Fed can simply continue on with its ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) of the past 30 years. Well, no; because
it would end up bankrupting all those private and public pension funds.
You say what? Pension funds normally use
an investment assumption rate of 8%. That is, public and state entities
negotiate with their employees over retirement benefits based on the assumption
of earning 8%. However, when the investment return on those funds is less than
8%, like 2% in today’s investment environment, what the public entities have
promised their retirees cannot be fulfilled. The promise was 8% to retirees but
the fund earned 2%. The consequence is a major unfunded pension plan.
Therefore, in order for these pension plans to fulfill their promises and survive,
interest rates will have to rise. And,
that is the balancing act the Fed is trying to resolve. Keep interest low enough to to keep the U.S.
economy out of a recession but not low enough to bankrupt all those private and
public pension plans. Well, good luck with that! (Financial Insights for the
Eschaton)
No comments:
Post a Comment